# ASC 718-50: Compensation—Stock Compensation — Employee Share Purchase Plans Source: FASB Accounting Standards Codification, Basic View [Read online](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/) Study and research edition. Verify current requirements with the official source. Summaries, enrichment, and tags are machine-generated study aids. Paragraph html preserves source markup; snippet is abbreviated. Pending content is not necessarily effective. Tables and mathematical or amendment markup are retained as HTML where Markdown would lose structure. Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:05:58.962Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:88730ceb0b56a8e8923da6335960107f1b6aec480f2158edf9eba5873fae9afc Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. ## ASC 718-50: Compensation—Stock Compensation — Employee Share Purchase Plans ### Machine-generated study aids ```json { "summary": "ASC 718-50 governs employee share purchase plans (ESPPs), including Section 423-style plans. Its core rule is a three-part test in 718-50-25-1: a plan is noncompensatory only if (a) its terms are no more favorable than those available to all holders of the same class of shares or the discount does not exceed the per-share cost of raising capital publicly (a 5% or smaller discount is automatically acceptable), (b) substantially all employees meeting limited employment qualifications may participate on an equitable basis, and (c) the plan has no option features other than two narrow exceptions. If the plan is compensatory (e.g., it has a look-back feature), grant-date fair value is measured by valuing the award as the sum of its separate components, and the requisite service period is the period over which the employee participates and pays for the shares.", "key_points": [ "A plan is noncompensatory only if it meets all three criteria in 718-50-25-1: no-more-favorable terms (or a justifiable discount), participation by substantially all employees meeting limited employment qualifications on an equitable basis, and no option features beyond the two permitted ones (a 31-day-or-less enrollment window after the price is fixed, or a purchase price based solely on the market price at the purchase date with a refundable cancellation right).", "A purchase discount of 5% or less needs no further justification; a greater discount must be justified as equal to per-share share issuance costs of a public offering, must be reassessed at least annually (and no later than the first share purchase offer of the fiscal year), and if unjustified the entire discount—not just the excess over 5%—is compensation cost (718-50-25-1(a)(2); 718-50-55-35).", "A look-back feature (price based on the lesser of grant-date or purchase-date market price) is an option feature that makes the plan compensatory, as is a grant-date-priced plan that permits cancellation and refund before the purchase date (718-50-25-2; 718-50-55-11); the requisite service period is the period over which the employee participates in the plan and pays for the shares (718-50-25-3).", "A look-back option is valued at grant date as a combination position—0.15 of a share of nonvested stock plus 0.85 of a share option with an exercise price equal to the grant-date share price (718-50-55-13 through 55-17); a Type B plan (variable number of shares) adds 15% of a put option because the employee is guaranteed at least 15% of the grant-date price (718-50-55-5, 55-24).", "Plans with multiple purchase periods are valued at grant date as a series of linked tranches, like a graded vesting award, with separate lives and consistent assumptions for each tranche (718-50-55-26); compensation cost is measured on the number of shares purchasable with estimated withholdings at the grant-date price (718-50-55-25).", "Reset or rollover mechanisms becoming effective, and employee elections to increase withholdings for future services, are treated as modifications under 718-20-35-3 through 35-9; automatic increases in withholdings from salary raises, commissions, or bonuses are not modifications and add cost only for the incremental shares at grant-date fair value (718-50-35-1; 718-50-55-28 through 55-29).", "Decreases in withholding amounts are disregarded for recognizing compensation cost unless the valued employee services will no longer be provided due to termination, and no cost is recognized for awards forfeited for failure to satisfy a service vesting requirement (718-50-35-2)." ], "categories": [ "Stock compensation", "Compensation and benefits", "Initial measurement", "Recognition" ], "audience_level": "intermediate", "student_note": "Exam questions hinge on the three-part noncompensatory test\\u2014any option feature (especially a look-back) blows the exemption, and an unjustified discount above 5% makes the ENTIRE discount compensation, not just the excess. A second common trap: an employee's election to increase withholdings is a modification, but an increase caused solely by a salary raise is not.", "related_topics": [ "718-10", "718-20", "718-30", "718-40", "505-50" ], "key_concepts": [ "employee share purchase plan", "noncompensatory plan criteria", "look-back option", "purchase discount", "grant-date fair value", "component valuation approach", "requisite service period", "modification accounting" ] } ``` Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:05:58.962Z to 2026-09-10T01:05:58.962Z Record version: sha256:6735bc2f3da753a2feb650bccf68410e4275228fa432ad6348623256cb76c6d3 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. ## ASC 718-50-00: 00 Status [Read section](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#00-status) SEC content: no ##### [718-50-00-1](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-00-1) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:05:58.962Z to 2026-09-10T01:05:58.962Z Record version: sha256:d163b02c4c28dafcc34e0c383d562d9714ce7d9d39996e2c24a724db4ee477e9 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
ParagraphActionAccounting Standards UpdateDate
AwardAmendedAccounting Standards Update No. 2018-0706/20/2018
Employee (2nd def.)AmendedAccounting Standards Update No. 2024-0311/04/2024
Grant DateAmendedAccounting Standards Update No. 2019-0811/11/2019
Grant DateAmendedAccounting Standards Update No. 2018-0706/20/2018
Issued, Issuance, or Issuing of an Equity InstrumentAddedAccounting Standards Update No. 2016-1912/14/2016
ModificationAmendedAccounting Standards Update No. 2017-0905/10/2017
Service Inception DateAmendedAccounting Standards Update No. 2018-0706/20/2018
Share OptionAmendedAccounting Standards Update No. 2018-0706/20/2018
718-50-30-1AmendedAccounting Standards Update No. 2018-0706/20/2018
718-50-30-1AmendedAccounting Standards Update No. 2016-1912/14/2016
Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:00.662Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:00.662Z Record version: sha256:4be33576cf2ae8aa2e9b246d75dc184eda65ef9a910243279eef2df662c8d788 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. ## ASC 718-50-05: 05 Overview and Background [Read section](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#05-overview-and-background) SEC content: no ##### [718-50-05-1](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-05-1) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:00.662Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:00.662Z Record version: sha256:993241b9e81f6f7e6cc0548c58fe35acc78965b689dfc606e78ebd1a291782c1 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. This Subtopic provides guidance to entities that use [employee](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/e/#employee "An individual over whom the grantor of a share-based compensation award exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A reporting entity based in a foreign jurisdiction would determine whether an employee-employer relationship exists based on the pertinent laws of that jurisdiction. Accordingly, a grantee meets the definition of an employee if the grantor consistently represents that individual to be an employee under common law. The definition of an employee for payroll tax purposes under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code includes common law employees. Accordingly, a grantor that classifies a grantee potentially subject to U.S. payroll taxes as an employee also must represent that individual as an employee for payroll tax purposes (unless the grantee is a leased employee as described below). A grantee does not meet the definition of an employee solely because the grantor represents that individual as an employee for some, but not all, purposes. For example, a requirement or decision to classify a grantee as an employee for U.S. payroll tax purposes does not, by itself, indicate that the grantee is an employee because the grantee also must be an employee of the grantor under common law. A leased individual is deemed to be an employee of the lessee if all of the following requirements are met: The leased individual qualifies as a common law employee of the lessee, and the lessor is contractually required to remit payroll taxes on the compensation paid to the leased individual for the services provided to the lessee. The lessor and lessee agree in writing to all of the following conditions related to the leased individual: The lessee has the exclusive right to grant stock compensation to the individual for the employee service to the lessee. The lessee has a right to hire, fire, and control the activities of the individual. (The lessor also may have that right.) The lessee has the exclusive right to determine the economic value of the services performed by the individual (including wages and the number of units and value of stock compensation granted). The individual has the ability to participate in the lessee's employee benefit plans, if any, on the same basis as other comparable employees of the lessee. The lessee agrees to and remits to the lessor funds sufficient to cover the complete compensation, including all payroll taxes, of the individual on or before a contractually agreed upon date or dates. A nonemployee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, nonemployee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer's shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards granted to nonemployee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted to those individuals for other services shall be accounted for as awards to nonemployees. (P) December 16, 2026; (N) December 16, 2026220-40-65-1An individual over whom a reporting entity exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A reporting entity based in a foreign jurisdiction would determine whether an employee-employer relationship exists based on the pertinent laws of that jurisdiction. Accordingly, an individual meets the definition of an employee if the reporting entity consistently represents that individual to be an employee under common law. The definition of an employee for payroll tax purposes under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code includes common law employees. Accordingly, a reporting entity that classifies an individual potentially subject to U.S. payroll taxes as an employee also must represent that individual as an employee for payroll tax purposes (unless the individual is a leased employee as described below). An individual that meets the definition of an employee includes, but is not limited to, a full-time, part-time, temporary, or seasonal employee. An individual does not meet the definition of an employee solely because the reporting entity represents that individual as an employee for some, but not all, purposes. For example, a requirement or decision to classify an individual as an employee for U.S. payroll tax purposes does not, by itself, indicate that the individual is an employee because the individual also must be an employee of the reporting entity under common law. A leased individual is deemed to be an employee of the lessee if all of the following requirements are met: The leased individual qualifies as a common law employee of the lessee, and the lessor is contractually required to remit payroll taxes on the compensation paid to the leased individual for the services provided to the lessee. The lessor and lessee agree in writing to all of the following conditions related to the leased individual: The lessee has the exclusive right to grant compensation to the individual for the employee service to the lessee. The lessee has a right to hire, fire, and control the activities of the individual. (The lessor also may have that right.) The lessee has the exclusive right to determine the economic value of the services performed by the individual (including wages and the number of units and value of stock compensation granted). The individual has the ability to participate in the lessee's employee benefit plans, if any, on the same basis as other comparable employees of the lessee. The lessee agrees to and remits to the lessor funds sufficient to cover the complete compensation, including all payroll taxes, of the individual on or before a contractually agreed upon date or dates. A nonemployee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, nonemployee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer's shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards and other compensation granted to nonemployee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted and compensation paid to those individuals for other services shall be accounted for as awards and compensation to nonemployees.") share purchase plans. The entity must first determine whether the plan is compensatory or noncompensatory. This is determined by the terms of the plan (see paragraphs [718-50-25-1 through 25-2](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-25-1) ). A plan with an option feature, for example a look-back feature, is considered compensatory. For a compensatory plan the calculation of the amount of the compensation is important (see Section 718-50-55). Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:03.727Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:03.727Z Record version: sha256:021fdee8ff2e1472863bac18cdbb2e343579ce3e4d1bcb7d191341e2b77e2a6f Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. ## ASC 718-50-15: 15 Scope and Scope Exceptions [Read section](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#15-scope-and-scope-exceptions) SEC content: no #### Overall Guidance ##### [718-50-15-1](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-15-1) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:03.727Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:03.727Z Record version: sha256:e7c440824049f38e9f79d247861545f153b6de1c6c4d33dbb5e2f2d9d39c4839 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. This Subtopic has its own discrete scope, which is separate and distinct from the pervasive scope for this Topic as outlined in Section 718-10-15. #### Entities ##### [718-50-15-2](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-15-2) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:03.727Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:03.727Z Record version: sha256:3818c3f56fa18440f4ce6f028098bf497dd670484d71722485261ac93a00f1b1 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. The guidance in this Subtopic applies to all entities. Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:08.707Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:08.707Z Record version: sha256:af2ca38653e3ef41229d1259f61a99e3f935d85f790d3095de1d548bee95df86 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. ## ASC 718-50-25: 25 Recognition [Read section](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#25-recognition) SEC content: no ##### [718-50-25-1](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-25-1) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:08.707Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:08.707Z Record version: sha256:46848e640760cf175b8807536ae1e6a25e35a7cbfc882028dd3e33e54646b29e Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. An employee share purchase plan that satisfies all of the following criteria does not give rise to recognizable compensation cost (that is, the plan is noncompensatory): 1. a The plan satisfies either of the following conditions: 1. 1 The terms of the plan are no more favorable than those available to all holders of the same class of shares. Note that a transaction subject to an employee share purchase plan that involves a class of equity shares designed exclusively for and held only by current or former employees or their beneficiaries may be compensatory depending on the terms of the arrangement. 2. 2 Any purchase discount from the market price does not exceed the per-share amount of share issuance costs that would have been incurred to raise a significant amount of capital by a public offering. A purchase discount of 5 percent or less from the market price shall be considered to comply with this condition without further justification. A purchase discount greater than 5 percent that cannot be justified under this condition results in compensation cost for the entire amount of the discount. Note that an entity that justifies a purchase discount in excess of 5 percent shall reassess at least annually, and no later than the first share purchase offer during the fiscal year, whether it can continue to justify that discount pursuant to this paragraph. 2. b Substantially all [employees](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/e/#employee "An individual over whom the grantor of a share-based compensation award exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A reporting entity based in a foreign jurisdiction would determine whether an employee-employer relationship exists based on the pertinent laws of that jurisdiction. Accordingly, a grantee meets the definition of an employee if the grantor consistently represents that individual to be an employee under common law. The definition of an employee for payroll tax purposes under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code includes common law employees. Accordingly, a grantor that classifies a grantee potentially subject to U.S. payroll taxes as an employee also must represent that individual as an employee for payroll tax purposes (unless the grantee is a leased employee as described below). A grantee does not meet the definition of an employee solely because the grantor represents that individual as an employee for some, but not all, purposes. For example, a requirement or decision to classify a grantee as an employee for U.S. payroll tax purposes does not, by itself, indicate that the grantee is an employee because the grantee also must be an employee of the grantor under common law. A leased individual is deemed to be an employee of the lessee if all of the following requirements are met: The leased individual qualifies as a common law employee of the lessee, and the lessor is contractually required to remit payroll taxes on the compensation paid to the leased individual for the services provided to the lessee. The lessor and lessee agree in writing to all of the following conditions related to the leased individual: The lessee has the exclusive right to grant stock compensation to the individual for the employee service to the lessee. The lessee has a right to hire, fire, and control the activities of the individual. (The lessor also may have that right.) The lessee has the exclusive right to determine the economic value of the services performed by the individual (including wages and the number of units and value of stock compensation granted). The individual has the ability to participate in the lessee's employee benefit plans, if any, on the same basis as other comparable employees of the lessee. The lessee agrees to and remits to the lessor funds sufficient to cover the complete compensation, including all payroll taxes, of the individual on or before a contractually agreed upon date or dates. A nonemployee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, nonemployee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer's shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards granted to nonemployee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted to those individuals for other services shall be accounted for as awards to nonemployees. (P) December 16, 2026; (N) December 16, 2026220-40-65-1An individual over whom a reporting entity exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A reporting entity based in a foreign jurisdiction would determine whether an employee-employer relationship exists based on the pertinent laws of that jurisdiction. Accordingly, an individual meets the definition of an employee if the reporting entity consistently represents that individual to be an employee under common law. The definition of an employee for payroll tax purposes under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code includes common law employees. Accordingly, a reporting entity that classifies an individual potentially subject to U.S. payroll taxes as an employee also must represent that individual as an employee for payroll tax purposes (unless the individual is a leased employee as described below). An individual that meets the definition of an employee includes, but is not limited to, a full-time, part-time, temporary, or seasonal employee. An individual does not meet the definition of an employee solely because the reporting entity represents that individual as an employee for some, but not all, purposes. For example, a requirement or decision to classify an individual as an employee for U.S. payroll tax purposes does not, by itself, indicate that the individual is an employee because the individual also must be an employee of the reporting entity under common law. A leased individual is deemed to be an employee of the lessee if all of the following requirements are met: The leased individual qualifies as a common law employee of the lessee, and the lessor is contractually required to remit payroll taxes on the compensation paid to the leased individual for the services provided to the lessee. The lessor and lessee agree in writing to all of the following conditions related to the leased individual: The lessee has the exclusive right to grant compensation to the individual for the employee service to the lessee. The lessee has a right to hire, fire, and control the activities of the individual. (The lessor also may have that right.) The lessee has the exclusive right to determine the economic value of the services performed by the individual (including wages and the number of units and value of stock compensation granted). The individual has the ability to participate in the lessee's employee benefit plans, if any, on the same basis as other comparable employees of the lessee. The lessee agrees to and remits to the lessor funds sufficient to cover the complete compensation, including all payroll taxes, of the individual on or before a contractually agreed upon date or dates. A nonemployee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, nonemployee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer's shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards and other compensation granted to nonemployee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted and compensation paid to those individuals for other services shall be accounted for as awards and compensation to nonemployees.") that meet limited employment qualifications may participate on an equitable basis. 3. c The plan incorporates no option features, other than the following: 1. 1 Employees are permitted a short period of time—not exceeding 31 days—after the purchase price has been fixed to enroll in the plan. 2. 2 The purchase price is based solely on the market price of the shares at the date of purchase, and employees are permitted to cancel participation before the purchase date and obtain a refund of amounts previously paid (such as those paid by payroll withholdings). ##### [718-50-25-2](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-25-2) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:08.707Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:08.707Z Record version: sha256:961554c96ff60d7ba0fe0e8dc75cf1230fb54575477a316bc923045b57e1289f Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. A plan provision that establishes the purchase price as an amount based on the lesser of the equity share's market price at date of grant or its market price at date of purchase, commonly called a look-back plan, is an example of an option feature that causes the plan to be compensatory. Similarly, a plan in which the purchase price is based on the share's market price at date of grant and that permits a participating employee to cancel participation before the purchase date and obtain a refund of amounts previously paid contains an option feature that causes the plan to be compensatory. Section 718-50-55 provides guidance on determining whether an employee share purchase plan satisfies the criteria necessary to be considered noncompensatory. ##### [718-50-25-3](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-25-3) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:08.707Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:08.707Z Record version: sha256:4fca1230b2b514c39a483ee7471342c27a42600a53831cdb6295372e765920ca Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. The requisite service period for any compensation cost resulting from an employee share purchase plan is the period over which the employee participates in the plan and pays for the shares. Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:12.217Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:12.217Z Record version: sha256:aed7a5ce6e64c815af5829953b2f7fbfb92af8a6d0a8d37b0bc331f50de9efd3 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. ## ASC 718-50-30: 30 Initial Measurement [Read section](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#30-initial-measurement) SEC content: no ##### [718-50-30-1](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-30-1) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:12.217Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:12.217Z Record version: sha256:5d86f5513a1b48896a4409e755a991cd9e028c37ec46f871a2d7750d0382bda7 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. Paragraph [718-10-30-6](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/10/#718-10-30-6) states that the objective of the [fair value](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/f/#fair-value "The amount at which an asset (or liability) could be bought (or incurred) or sold (or settled) in a current transaction between willing parties, that is, other than in a forced or liquidation sale.") measurement method is to estimate the fair value of the equity instruments, based on the share price and other measurement assumptions at the [grant date](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/g/#grant-date "The date at which a grantor and a grantee reach a mutual understanding of the key terms and conditions of a share-based payment award. The grantor becomes contingently obligated on the grant date to issue equity instruments or transfer assets to a grantee who delivers goods or renders services or purchases goods or services as a customer. Awards made under an arrangement that is subject to shareholder approval are not deemed to be granted until that approval is obtained unless approval is essentially a formality (or perfunctory), for example, if management and the members of the board of directors control enough votes to approve the arrangement. Similarly, individual awards that are subject to approval by the board of directors, management, or both are not deemed to be granted until all such approvals are obtained. The grant date for an award of equity instruments is the date that a grantee begins to benefit from, or be adversely affected by, subsequent changes in the price of the grantor's equity shares. Paragraph 718-10-25-5 provides guidance on determining the grant date. See Service Inception Date."), that are [issued](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/i/#issued-issuance-or-issuing-of-an-equity-instrument "An equity instrument is issued when the issuing entity receives the agreed-upon consideration, which may be cash, an enforceable right to receive cash, or another financial instrument, goods, or services. An entity may conditionally transfer an equity instrument to another party under an arrangement that permits that party to choose at a later date or for a specified time whether to deliver the consideration or to forfeit the right to the conditionally transferred instrument with no further obligation. In that situation, the equity instrument is not issued until the issuing entity has received the consideration. The grant of stock options or other equity instruments subject to vesting conditions is not considered to be issuance.") in exchange for providing goods or rendering services. Estimating the fair value of equity instruments at the grant date, which are issued in exchange for [employee](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/e/#employee "An individual over whom the grantor of a share-based compensation award exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A reporting entity based in a foreign jurisdiction would determine whether an employee-employer relationship exists based on the pertinent laws of that jurisdiction. Accordingly, a grantee meets the definition of an employee if the grantor consistently represents that individual to be an employee under common law. The definition of an employee for payroll tax purposes under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code includes common law employees. Accordingly, a grantor that classifies a grantee potentially subject to U.S. payroll taxes as an employee also must represent that individual as an employee for payroll tax purposes (unless the grantee is a leased employee as described below). A grantee does not meet the definition of an employee solely because the grantor represents that individual as an employee for some, but not all, purposes. For example, a requirement or decision to classify a grantee as an employee for U.S. payroll tax purposes does not, by itself, indicate that the grantee is an employee because the grantee also must be an employee of the grantor under common law. A leased individual is deemed to be an employee of the lessee if all of the following requirements are met: The leased individual qualifies as a common law employee of the lessee, and the lessor is contractually required to remit payroll taxes on the compensation paid to the leased individual for the services provided to the lessee. The lessor and lessee agree in writing to all of the following conditions related to the leased individual: The lessee has the exclusive right to grant stock compensation to the individual for the employee service to the lessee. The lessee has a right to hire, fire, and control the activities of the individual. (The lessor also may have that right.) The lessee has the exclusive right to determine the economic value of the services performed by the individual (including wages and the number of units and value of stock compensation granted). The individual has the ability to participate in the lessee's employee benefit plans, if any, on the same basis as other comparable employees of the lessee. The lessee agrees to and remits to the lessor funds sufficient to cover the complete compensation, including all payroll taxes, of the individual on or before a contractually agreed upon date or dates. A nonemployee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, nonemployee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer's shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards granted to nonemployee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted to those individuals for other services shall be accounted for as awards to nonemployees. (P) December 16, 2026; (N) December 16, 2026220-40-65-1An individual over whom a reporting entity exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A reporting entity based in a foreign jurisdiction would determine whether an employee-employer relationship exists based on the pertinent laws of that jurisdiction. Accordingly, an individual meets the definition of an employee if the reporting entity consistently represents that individual to be an employee under common law. The definition of an employee for payroll tax purposes under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code includes common law employees. Accordingly, a reporting entity that classifies an individual potentially subject to U.S. payroll taxes as an employee also must represent that individual as an employee for payroll tax purposes (unless the individual is a leased employee as described below). An individual that meets the definition of an employee includes, but is not limited to, a full-time, part-time, temporary, or seasonal employee. An individual does not meet the definition of an employee solely because the reporting entity represents that individual as an employee for some, but not all, purposes. For example, a requirement or decision to classify an individual as an employee for U.S. payroll tax purposes does not, by itself, indicate that the individual is an employee because the individual also must be an employee of the reporting entity under common law. A leased individual is deemed to be an employee of the lessee if all of the following requirements are met: The leased individual qualifies as a common law employee of the lessee, and the lessor is contractually required to remit payroll taxes on the compensation paid to the leased individual for the services provided to the lessee. The lessor and lessee agree in writing to all of the following conditions related to the leased individual: The lessee has the exclusive right to grant compensation to the individual for the employee service to the lessee. The lessee has a right to hire, fire, and control the activities of the individual. (The lessor also may have that right.) The lessee has the exclusive right to determine the economic value of the services performed by the individual (including wages and the number of units and value of stock compensation granted). The individual has the ability to participate in the lessee's employee benefit plans, if any, on the same basis as other comparable employees of the lessee. The lessee agrees to and remits to the lessor funds sufficient to cover the complete compensation, including all payroll taxes, of the individual on or before a contractually agreed upon date or dates. A nonemployee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, nonemployee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer's shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards and other compensation granted to nonemployee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted and compensation paid to those individuals for other services shall be accounted for as awards and compensation to nonemployees.") services, also applies to the fair value measurements associated with grants under a compensatory employee share purchase plan and is the basis for the approach described in Example 1, Case A (see paragraph [718-50-55-10](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-10)). #### Look-Back Plans ##### [718-50-30-2](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-30-2) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:12.217Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:12.217Z Record version: sha256:e19ac277ab2a1c1669e1bf5f19942cbcdd48dd84f8fad9e85a12108340c50ada Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. Many employee share purchase plans with a look-back option have features in addition to or different from those of the plan described in Example 1, Case A (see paragraph [718-50-55-10](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-10)). For example, some plans contain multiple purchase periods, others contain reset mechanisms, and still others allow changes in the withholding amounts or percentages after the grant date (see Example 1, Cases B through E \[see paragraphs [718-50-55-22 through 55-33](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-22) \]). ##### [718-50-30-3](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-30-3) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:12.217Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:12.217Z Record version: sha256:2ee408171dff2402af74c2a499ac79019130e0b820678b8cacabf24461f83650 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. In some circumstances, applying the measurement approaches described in this Subtopic at the grant date may not be practicable for certain types of employee share purchase plans. Paragraph [718-20-35-1](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/20/#718-20-35-1) provides guidance on the measurement requirements if it is not possible to reasonably estimate fair value at the grant date. Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:15.758Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:15.758Z Record version: sha256:5a8c8b60649e99ad2c5520177181d5aa3e34ac4ae076830967d23a8d2b992c50 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. ## ASC 718-50-35: 35 Subsequent Measurement [Read section](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#35-subsequent-measurement) SEC content: no ##### [718-50-35-1](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-35-1) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:15.758Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:15.758Z Record version: sha256:63fe36408772ce60d7c5dcddbdadb1d0321683ed62de499a96052f4947c3e21c Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. Changes in total [employee](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/e/#employee "An individual over whom the grantor of a share-based compensation award exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A reporting entity based in a foreign jurisdiction would determine whether an employee-employer relationship exists based on the pertinent laws of that jurisdiction. Accordingly, a grantee meets the definition of an employee if the grantor consistently represents that individual to be an employee under common law. The definition of an employee for payroll tax purposes under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code includes common law employees. Accordingly, a grantor that classifies a grantee potentially subject to U.S. payroll taxes as an employee also must represent that individual as an employee for payroll tax purposes (unless the grantee is a leased employee as described below). A grantee does not meet the definition of an employee solely because the grantor represents that individual as an employee for some, but not all, purposes. For example, a requirement or decision to classify a grantee as an employee for U.S. payroll tax purposes does not, by itself, indicate that the grantee is an employee because the grantee also must be an employee of the grantor under common law. A leased individual is deemed to be an employee of the lessee if all of the following requirements are met: The leased individual qualifies as a common law employee of the lessee, and the lessor is contractually required to remit payroll taxes on the compensation paid to the leased individual for the services provided to the lessee. The lessor and lessee agree in writing to all of the following conditions related to the leased individual: The lessee has the exclusive right to grant stock compensation to the individual for the employee service to the lessee. The lessee has a right to hire, fire, and control the activities of the individual. (The lessor also may have that right.) The lessee has the exclusive right to determine the economic value of the services performed by the individual (including wages and the number of units and value of stock compensation granted). The individual has the ability to participate in the lessee's employee benefit plans, if any, on the same basis as other comparable employees of the lessee. The lessee agrees to and remits to the lessor funds sufficient to cover the complete compensation, including all payroll taxes, of the individual on or before a contractually agreed upon date or dates. A nonemployee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, nonemployee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer's shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards granted to nonemployee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted to those individuals for other services shall be accounted for as awards to nonemployees. (P) December 16, 2026; (N) December 16, 2026220-40-65-1An individual over whom a reporting entity exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A reporting entity based in a foreign jurisdiction would determine whether an employee-employer relationship exists based on the pertinent laws of that jurisdiction. Accordingly, an individual meets the definition of an employee if the reporting entity consistently represents that individual to be an employee under common law. The definition of an employee for payroll tax purposes under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code includes common law employees. Accordingly, a reporting entity that classifies an individual potentially subject to U.S. payroll taxes as an employee also must represent that individual as an employee for payroll tax purposes (unless the individual is a leased employee as described below). An individual that meets the definition of an employee includes, but is not limited to, a full-time, part-time, temporary, or seasonal employee. An individual does not meet the definition of an employee solely because the reporting entity represents that individual as an employee for some, but not all, purposes. For example, a requirement or decision to classify an individual as an employee for U.S. payroll tax purposes does not, by itself, indicate that the individual is an employee because the individual also must be an employee of the reporting entity under common law. A leased individual is deemed to be an employee of the lessee if all of the following requirements are met: The leased individual qualifies as a common law employee of the lessee, and the lessor is contractually required to remit payroll taxes on the compensation paid to the leased individual for the services provided to the lessee. The lessor and lessee agree in writing to all of the following conditions related to the leased individual: The lessee has the exclusive right to grant compensation to the individual for the employee service to the lessee. The lessee has a right to hire, fire, and control the activities of the individual. (The lessor also may have that right.) The lessee has the exclusive right to determine the economic value of the services performed by the individual (including wages and the number of units and value of stock compensation granted). The individual has the ability to participate in the lessee's employee benefit plans, if any, on the same basis as other comparable employees of the lessee. The lessee agrees to and remits to the lessor funds sufficient to cover the complete compensation, including all payroll taxes, of the individual on or before a contractually agreed upon date or dates. A nonemployee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, nonemployee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer's shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards and other compensation granted to nonemployee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted and compensation paid to those individuals for other services shall be accounted for as awards and compensation to nonemployees.") withholdings during a purchase period that occur solely as a result of salary increases, commissions, or bonus payments are not plan modifications if they do not represent changes to the terms of the [award](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/a/#award "The collective noun for multiple instruments with the same terms and conditions granted at the same time either to a single grantee or to a group of grantees. An award may specify multiple vesting dates, referred to as graded vesting, and different parts of an award may have different expected terms. References to an award also apply to a portion of an award.") that was offered by the employer and initially agreed to by the employee at the grant (or measurement) date. Under those circumstances, the only incremental compensation cost is that which results from the additional shares that may be purchased with the additional amounts withheld (using the [fair value](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/f/#fair-value "The amount at which an asset (or liability) could be bought (or incurred) or sold (or settled) in a current transaction between willing parties, that is, other than in a forced or liquidation sale.") calculated at the [grant date](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/g/#grant-date "The date at which a grantor and a grantee reach a mutual understanding of the key terms and conditions of a share-based payment award. The grantor becomes contingently obligated on the grant date to issue equity instruments or transfer assets to a grantee who delivers goods or renders services or purchases goods or services as a customer. Awards made under an arrangement that is subject to shareholder approval are not deemed to be granted until that approval is obtained unless approval is essentially a formality (or perfunctory), for example, if management and the members of the board of directors control enough votes to approve the arrangement. Similarly, individual awards that are subject to approval by the board of directors, management, or both are not deemed to be granted until all such approvals are obtained. The grant date for an award of equity instruments is the date that a grantee begins to benefit from, or be adversely affected by, subsequent changes in the price of the grantor's equity shares. Paragraph 718-10-25-5 provides guidance on determining the grant date. See Service Inception Date.")). For example, an employee may elect to participate in the plan on the grant date by requesting that 5 percent of the employee's annual salary be withheld for future purchases of stock. If the employee receives an increase in salary during the term of the award, the base salary on which the 5 percent withholding amount is applied will increase, thus increasing the total amount withheld for future share purchases. That increase in withholdings as a result of the salary increase is not considered a plan [modification](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/m/#modification "A change in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award.") and thus only increases the total compensation cost associated with the award by the grant date fair value associated with the incremental number of shares that may be purchased with the additional withholdings during the period. The incremental number of shares that may be purchased is calculated by dividing the incremental amount withheld by the exercise price as of the grant date (for example, 85 percent of the grant date stock price). ##### [718-50-35-2](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-35-2) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:15.758Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:15.758Z Record version: sha256:23bbf094619477ad538f5a31b381908696ce1d1823d57fa72493baf98432450b Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. Any decreases in the withholding amounts (or percentages) shall be disregarded for purposes of recognizing compensation cost unless the employee services that were valued at the grant date will no longer be provided to the employer due to a termination. However, no compensation cost shall be recognized for awards that an employee forfeits because of failure to satisfy a service requirement for vesting. The accounting for decreases in withholdings is consistent with the requirement in paragraph [718-10-35-3](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/10/#718-10-35-3) that the total amount of compensation cost that must be recognized for an award be based on the number of instruments for which the requisite service has been rendered (that is, for which the requisite service period has been completed). Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:feb27b39f373bae8b32d0e058738806a7fabd25e1cb2abdaa5ac640a70455868 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. ## ASC 718-50-55: 55 Implementation Guidance and Illustrations [Read section](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#55-implementation-guidance-and-illustrations) SEC content: no #### Implementation Guidance ##### [718-50-55-1](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-1) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:fdc2b748afcecf4db39ffc874b7e3b34fc255862796846300a658290e9ce203e Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. This Section may contain summaries or references to specific tax code or other regulations that existed at the time that the standard was issued. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) does not monitor such code or regulations and assumes no responsibility for the current accuracy of the summaries or references. Users must evaluate such code or regulations to determine consistency of the current code or regulation with that presented. ##### [718-50-55-2](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-2) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:0cd4222460e6bfe8b9c0d9d7a2e9ed01c843d5394776f9f135392a6a93b42e29 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. The following are some of the more common types of [employee](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/e/#employee "An individual over whom the grantor of a share-based compensation award exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A reporting entity based in a foreign jurisdiction would determine whether an employee-employer relationship exists based on the pertinent laws of that jurisdiction. Accordingly, a grantee meets the definition of an employee if the grantor consistently represents that individual to be an employee under common law. The definition of an employee for payroll tax purposes under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code includes common law employees. Accordingly, a grantor that classifies a grantee potentially subject to U.S. payroll taxes as an employee also must represent that individual as an employee for payroll tax purposes (unless the grantee is a leased employee as described below). A grantee does not meet the definition of an employee solely because the grantor represents that individual as an employee for some, but not all, purposes. For example, a requirement or decision to classify a grantee as an employee for U.S. payroll tax purposes does not, by itself, indicate that the grantee is an employee because the grantee also must be an employee of the grantor under common law. A leased individual is deemed to be an employee of the lessee if all of the following requirements are met: The leased individual qualifies as a common law employee of the lessee, and the lessor is contractually required to remit payroll taxes on the compensation paid to the leased individual for the services provided to the lessee. The lessor and lessee agree in writing to all of the following conditions related to the leased individual: The lessee has the exclusive right to grant stock compensation to the individual for the employee service to the lessee. The lessee has a right to hire, fire, and control the activities of the individual. (The lessor also may have that right.) The lessee has the exclusive right to determine the economic value of the services performed by the individual (including wages and the number of units and value of stock compensation granted). The individual has the ability to participate in the lessee's employee benefit plans, if any, on the same basis as other comparable employees of the lessee. The lessee agrees to and remits to the lessor funds sufficient to cover the complete compensation, including all payroll taxes, of the individual on or before a contractually agreed upon date or dates. A nonemployee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, nonemployee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer's shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards granted to nonemployee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted to those individuals for other services shall be accounted for as awards to nonemployees. (P) December 16, 2026; (N) December 16, 2026220-40-65-1An individual over whom a reporting entity exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A reporting entity based in a foreign jurisdiction would determine whether an employee-employer relationship exists based on the pertinent laws of that jurisdiction. Accordingly, an individual meets the definition of an employee if the reporting entity consistently represents that individual to be an employee under common law. The definition of an employee for payroll tax purposes under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code includes common law employees. Accordingly, a reporting entity that classifies an individual potentially subject to U.S. payroll taxes as an employee also must represent that individual as an employee for payroll tax purposes (unless the individual is a leased employee as described below). An individual that meets the definition of an employee includes, but is not limited to, a full-time, part-time, temporary, or seasonal employee. An individual does not meet the definition of an employee solely because the reporting entity represents that individual as an employee for some, but not all, purposes. For example, a requirement or decision to classify an individual as an employee for U.S. payroll tax purposes does not, by itself, indicate that the individual is an employee because the individual also must be an employee of the reporting entity under common law. A leased individual is deemed to be an employee of the lessee if all of the following requirements are met: The leased individual qualifies as a common law employee of the lessee, and the lessor is contractually required to remit payroll taxes on the compensation paid to the leased individual for the services provided to the lessee. The lessor and lessee agree in writing to all of the following conditions related to the leased individual: The lessee has the exclusive right to grant compensation to the individual for the employee service to the lessee. The lessee has a right to hire, fire, and control the activities of the individual. (The lessor also may have that right.) The lessee has the exclusive right to determine the economic value of the services performed by the individual (including wages and the number of units and value of stock compensation granted). The individual has the ability to participate in the lessee's employee benefit plans, if any, on the same basis as other comparable employees of the lessee. The lessee agrees to and remits to the lessor funds sufficient to cover the complete compensation, including all payroll taxes, of the individual on or before a contractually agreed upon date or dates. A nonemployee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, nonemployee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer's shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards and other compensation granted to nonemployee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted and compensation paid to those individuals for other services shall be accounted for as awards and compensation to nonemployees.") share purchase plans with a look-back option that currently exist and the features that differentiate each type: 1. a Type A plan—Maximum number of shares. This type of plan permits an employee to have withheld a fixed amount of dollars from the employee's salary (or a stated percentage of the employee's salary) over a one-year period to purchase stock. At the end of the one-year period, the employee may purchase stock at 85 percent of the lower of the [grant date](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/g/#grant-date "The date at which a grantor and a grantee reach a mutual understanding of the key terms and conditions of a share-based payment award. The grantor becomes contingently obligated on the grant date to issue equity instruments or transfer assets to a grantee who delivers goods or renders services or purchases goods or services as a customer. Awards made under an arrangement that is subject to shareholder approval are not deemed to be granted until that approval is obtained unless approval is essentially a formality (or perfunctory), for example, if management and the members of the board of directors control enough votes to approve the arrangement. Similarly, individual awards that are subject to approval by the board of directors, management, or both are not deemed to be granted until all such approvals are obtained. The grant date for an award of equity instruments is the date that a grantee begins to benefit from, or be adversely affected by, subsequent changes in the price of the grantor's equity shares. Paragraph 718-10-25-5 provides guidance on determining the grant date. See Service Inception Date.") stock price or the exercise date stock price. If the exercise date stock price is lower than the grant date stock price, the employee may not purchase additional shares (that is, the maximum number of shares that may be purchased by an employee is established at the grant date based on the stock price at that date and the employee's elected withholdings); any excess cash is refunded to the employee. This is the basic type of employee share purchase plan shown in Example 1, Case A \[see paragraph [718-50-55-10](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-10)\]). 2. b Type B plan—Variable number of shares. This type of plan is the same as the Type A plan except that the employee may purchase as many shares as the full amount of the employee's withholdings will permit, regardless of whether the exercise date stock price is lower than the grant date stock price (see Example 1, Case B \[paragraph [718-50-55-22](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-22)\]). 3. c Type C plan—Multiple purchase periods. This type of plan permits an employee to have withheld a fixed amount of dollars from the employee's salary (or a stated percentage of the employee's salary) over a two-year period to purchase stock. At the end of each six-month period, the employee may purchase stock at 85 percent of the lower of the grant date stock price or the exercise date stock price based on the amount of dollars withheld during that period (see Example 1, Case C \[paragraph [718-50-55-26](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-26)\]). 4. d Type D plan—Multiple purchase periods with a reset mechanism. This type of plan is the same as the Type C plan except that the plan contains a reset feature if the market price of the stock at the end of any six-month purchase period is lower than the stock price at the original grant date. In that case, the plan resets so that during the next purchase period an employee may purchase stock at 85 percent of the lower of the stock price at either the beginning of the purchase period (rather than the original grant date price) or the exercise date (see Example 1, Case D \[paragraph [718-50-55-28](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-28)\]). 5. e Type E plan—Multiple purchase periods with a rollover mechanism. This type of plan is the same as the Type C plan except that the plan contains a rollover feature if the market price of the stock at the end of any six-month purchase period is lower than the stock price at the original grant date. In that case, the plan is immediately cancelled after that purchase date, and a new two-year plan is established using the then-current stock price as the base purchase price (see Example 1, Case D \[paragraph [718-50-55-28](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-28)\]) 6. f Type F plan—Multiple purchase periods with semifixed withholdings. This type of plan is the same as the Type C plan except that the amount (or percentage) that the employee may elect to have withheld is not fixed and may be changed (increased or decreased) at the employee's election immediately after each six-month purchase date for purposes of all future withholdings under the plan (see Example 1, Case D \[paragraph [718-50-55-28](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-28)\]). 7. g Type G plan—Single purchase period with variable withholdings. This type of plan permits an employee to have withheld an amount of dollars from the employee's salary (or a stated percentage of the employee's salary) over a one-year period to purchase stock. That amount (or percentage) is not fixed and may be changed (increased or decreased) at the employee's election at any time during the term of the plan for purposes of all future withholdings under the plan. At the end of the one-year period, the employee may purchase stock at 85 percent of the lower of the grant date stock price or the exercise date stock price (see Example 1, Case D \[paragraph [718-50-55-28](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-28)\]). 8. h Type H plan—Multiple purchase periods with variable withholdings. This type of plan combines the characteristics of the Type C and Type G plans in that there are multiple purchase periods over the term of the plan and an employee is permitted to change (increase or decrease) withholding amounts (or percentages) at any time during the term of the plan for purposes of all future withholdings under the plan (see Example 1, Case D \[paragraph [718-50-55-28](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-28)\]). 9. i Type I plan—Single purchase period with variable withholdings and cash infusions. This type of plan is the same as the Type G plan except that an employee is permitted to remit catch-up amounts to the entity when (and if) the employee increases withholding amounts (or percentages). The objective of the cash infusion feature is to permit an employee to increase withholding amounts (or percentages) during the term of the plan and remit an amount to the entity such that, on the exercise date, it appears that the employee had participated at the new higher amount (or percentage) during the entire term of the plan (see Example 1, Case E \[paragraph [718-50-55-32](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-32)\]). ##### [718-50-55-3](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-3) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:dc1a1eb7b322f293b9a7ec11c879e709b52f017e8bcc68377fa45492a76156db Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. The distinguishing characteristic between the Type A plan and the Type B plan is whether the maximum number of shares that an employee is permitted to purchase is fixed at the grant date based on the stock price at that date and the expected withholdings. Each of the remaining plans described above (Type C through Type I plans) incorporates the features of either a Type A plan or a Type B plan. The above descriptions are intended to be representative of the types of features commonly found in many existing plans. The accounting guidance in this Subtopic shall be applied to all plans with characteristics similar to those described above. ##### [718-50-55-4](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-4) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:841fd7c7597090bd2864acb3880560473855d9f4d1f37ef8432c9164847417e3 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. The measurement approach described in Example 1, Case A (see paragraph [718-50-55-10](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-10)) was developed to illustrate how the [fair value](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/f/#fair-value "The amount at which an asset (or liability) could be bought (or incurred) or sold (or settled) in a current transaction between willing parties, that is, other than in a forced or liquidation sale.") of an [award](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/a/#award "The collective noun for multiple instruments with the same terms and conditions granted at the same time either to a single grantee or to a group of grantees. An award may specify multiple vesting dates, referred to as graded vesting, and different parts of an award may have different expected terms. References to an award also apply to a portion of an award.") under a basic type of employee share purchase plan with a look-back option could be determined at the grant date by focusing on the substance of the arrangement and valuing separately each feature of the award. Although that general technique of valuing an award as the sum of the values of its separate components applies to all types of employee share purchase plans with a look-back option, the fundamental components of an award may differ from plan to plan thus affecting the individual calculations. For example, the measurement approach described in that Case assumes that the maximum number of shares that an employee may purchase is fixed at the grant date based on the grant date stock price and the employee's elected withholdings (that is, the Type A plan described in paragraph [718-50-55-2](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-2)). That approach needs to be modified to appropriately determine the fair value of awards under the other types of plans described in that paragraph, including a Type B plan, that do not fix the number of shares that an employee is permitted to purchase. ##### [718-50-55-5](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-5) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:4d816ccf5fa65b98946c44071bc6bb499f5128f9354283b5a20572cb36e1e089 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. Although many employee share purchase plans with a look-back option initially limit the maximum number of shares of stock that the employee is permitted to purchase under the plan (Type A plans), other employee share purchase plans (Type B plans) do not fix the number of shares that the employee is permitted to purchase if the exercise date stock price is lower than the grant date stock price. In effect, an employee share purchase plan that does not fix the number of shares that may be purchased has guaranteed that the employee can always receive the value associated with at least 15 percent of the stock price at the grant date (the employee can receive much more than 15 percent of the grant date value of the stock if the stock appreciates during the look-back period). That provision provides the employee with the equivalent of a put option on 15 percent of the shares with an exercise price equal to the stock price at the grant date. In contrast, an employee who participates in a Type A plan is only guaranteed 15 percent of the lower of the stock price as of the grant date or the exercise date, which is the equivalent of a call option on 85 percent of the shares (as described more fully in paragraph [718-50-55-16](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-16)). A participant in a Type B plan receives the equivalent of both a put option and a call option. #### Illustrations ##### [718-50-55-6](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-6) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:05bf9e71105cb95155f03addfbf0894a04680f3fc849245562a36b4673ef257c Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. The following Cases illustrate the guidance in paragraphs [718-50-30-1 through 30-2](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-30-1) . ##### [718-50-55-7](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-7) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:8bf4179c6facb92cff251ed911011deea501b15c94a0068c7d2b311191662352 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. The following Cases illustrate the fundamental differences between different types of look back plans: 1. a Basic look-back plans (Case A) 2. b Look-back plan variable versus maximum number of shares (Case B) 3. c Look-back plan with multiple purchase periods (Case C) 4. d Look-back plans with reset or rollover mechanisms (Case D) 5. e Look-back plans with retroactive cash infusion election (Case E). ##### [718-50-55-8](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-8) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:478e3bf58a7e6bf1e1f06f30c2ffd5364705b85bb790c16c6f9edb9fd8e4ae3f Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. The assumptions used for the numerical calculations in Cases B—E are not intended to be the same as those in Case A. Rather, they are independent and designed to illustrate how the component measurement approach in Case A would be modified to reflect various features of employee stock purchase plans. ##### [718-50-55-9](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-9) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:7f7c2e4294aeab6fb0a4d051b14c3bb361d37e1015730ce0bd49bf895ba20d6e Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. This Example does not take into consideration the effect of interest forgone by the employee on the fair value of an award for which the exercise price is paid over time (for instance, through payroll withholdings). Awards for which part or all of the exercise price is paid before the exercise date are less valuable than awards for which the exercise price is paid at the exercise date, and it is appropriate to recognize that difference in applying the guidance in this Subtopic. However, for simplicity, the effect of forgone interest is not reflected in the fair value calculations in this Example. ##### [718-50-55-10](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-10) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:abf77573ae7a7d39c5a6702ed98625d6cd2f1cd035c0e3206b691353635f4501 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. Some entities offer share options to employees under Section 423 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, which provides that employees will not be immediately taxed on the difference between the market price of the stock and a discounted purchase price if several requirements are met. One requirement is that the exercise price may not be less than the smaller of either: 1. a 85 percent of the stock's market price when the [share option](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/s/#share-option "A contract that gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, either to purchase (to call) or to sell (to put) a certain number of shares at a predetermined price for a specified period of time.") is granted 2. b 85 percent of the price at exercise. ##### [718-50-55-11](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-11) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:a9ab1dcea5be7b7fba0325ecd72f6156451977b39650bb671408d2257a794a59 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. A share option that provides the employee the choice of either option above may not have a term in excess of 27 months. Share options that provide for the more favorable of two (or more) exercise prices are referred to as look-back share options. A look-back share option with a 15 percent discount from the market price at either grant or exercise is worth more than a fixed share option to purchase stock at 85 percent of the current market price because the holder of the look-back share option is assured a benefit. If the share price rises, the holder benefits to the same extent as if the exercise price was fixed at the grant date. If the share price falls, the holder still receives the benefit of purchasing the stock at a 15 percent discount from its price at the date of exercise. An employee share purchase plan offering share options with a look-back feature would be compensatory because the look-back feature is an option feature (see paragraph [718-50-25-1](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-25-1)). ##### [718-50-55-12](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-12) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:5f91ee646b6a5763c24c2d98c74c47121172b1605c3504786a25134cb6e70814 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. For example, on January 1, 20X5, when its share price is $30, Entity A offers its employees the opportunity to sign up for a payroll deduction to purchase its stock at either 85 percent of the share's current price or 85 percent of the price at the end of the year when the share options expire, whichever is lower. The exercise price of the share options is the lesser of $25.50 ($30 ×.85) or 85 percent of the share price at the end of the year when the share options expire. ##### [718-50-55-13](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-13) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:8ecae7ebe27d696b66167d686905e53eb046b54769837ff78c7f787cd1db2a77 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. The look-back share option can be valued as a combination position. (This Case presents one of several existing valuation techniques for estimating the fair value of a look-back option. In accordance with this Topic, an entity shall use a valuation technique that reflects the substantive characteristics of the instrument being granted in the estimate of fair value.) In this situation, the components are as follows: 1. a 0.15 of a share of nonvested stock 2. b 0.85 of a 1-year share option held with an exercise price of $30. ##### [718-50-55-14](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-14) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:5e5d54a50cfc9bd2c0823d42df2ab8d1d37e17f58fdf395ed183ab82dfb675b0 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. Supporting analysis for the two components is discussed below. ##### [718-50-55-15](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-15) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:17efedbbf76d161c73f80e8f07b6112ef52a5f01d4055261b0ac4d7af5ef2fd5 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. Beginning with the first component, a share option with an exercise price that equals 85 percent of the value of the stock at the exercise date will always be worth 15 percent (100% - 85%) of the share price upon exercise. For a stock that pays no dividends, that share option is the equivalent of 15 percent of a share of the stock. The holder of the look-back share option will receive at least the equivalent of 0.15 of a share of stock upon exercise, regardless of the share price at that date. For example, if the share price falls to $20, the exercise price of the share option will be $17 ($20 ×.85), and the holder will benefit by $3 ($20 - $17), which is the same as receiving 0.15 of a share of stock for each share option. ##### [718-50-55-16](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-16) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:ee08f83162edb40020256d48f1cfaa98f5d712cdca7465d62133cedddfa1d347 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. If the share price upon exercise is more than $30, the holder of the look-back share option receives a benefit that is worth more than 15 percent of a share of stock. At prices of $30 or more, the holder receives a benefit for the difference between the share price upon exercise and $25.50—the exercise price of the share option (.85 × $30). If the share price is $40, the holder benefits by $14.50 ($40 - $25.50). However, the holder cannot receive both the $14.50 value of a share option with an exercise price of $25.50 and 0.15 of a share of stock. In effect, the holder gives up 0.15 of a share of stock worth $4.50 ($30 ×.15) if the share price is above $30 at exercise. The result is the same as if the exercise price of the share option was $30 ($25.50 + $4.50) and the holder of the look-back share option held 85 percent of a 1-year share option with an exercise price of $30 in addition to 0.15 of a share of stock that will be received if the share price is $30 or less upon exercise. ##### [718-50-55-17](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-17) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:e0fbb988ce3d79c93d4855ba69ac0bf4877184337eef91c6fd44d7bad9b4e650 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. An option-pricing model can be used to value the 1-year share option on 0.85 of a share of stock represented by the second component. Thus, assuming that the fair value of a share option on one share of Entity A's stock on the grant date is $4, the compensation cost for the look-back option at the grant date is as follows. - ![ ](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc-img/GUID-17ADA220-5F44-4C54-AFD4-9ACCC71D7192-low.gif) 0.15 of a share of nonvested stock ($30 × 0.15) $4.50 "Share option on 0.85 of a share of stock, exercise price of $30 ($4 × .85)" 3.40 Total grant date value $7.90 ##### [718-50-55-18](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-18) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:76703ec311590b6d623faa381b586878e9eba64074d2658f7f91afa0e6e2787e Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. For a look-back option on a dividend-paying share, both the value of the nonvested stock component and the value of the share option component would be adjusted to reflect the effect of the dividends that the employee does not receive during the life of the share option. The present value of the dividends expected to be paid on the stock during the life of the share option (one year in this Case) would be deducted from the value of a share that receives dividends. One way to accomplish that is to base the value calculation on shares of stock rather than dollars by assuming that the dividends are reinvested in the stock. ##### [718-50-55-19](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-19) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:3bc0fce950043f3efb448f763d62478d9d33f4eadea1754c3f2d9015dd6ba841 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. For example, if Entity A pays a quarterly dividend of 0.625 percent (2.5% ÷ 4) of the current share price, 1 share of stock would grow to 1.0252 (the future value of 1 using a return of 0.625 percent for 4 periods) shares at the end of the year if all dividends are reinvested. Therefore, the present value of 1 share of stock to be received in 1 year is only 0.9754 of a share today (again applying conventional compound interest formulas compounded quarterly) if the holder does not receive the dividends paid during the year. ##### [718-50-55-20](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-20) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:0228de1a7643fbd869f4196818143668f5dbdd2185f2fb465bd975dce4018b2a Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. The value of the share option component is easier to compute; the appropriate dividend assumption is used in an option-pricing model in estimating the value of a share option on a whole share of stock. Thus, assuming the fair value of the share option is $3.60, the compensation cost for the look-back share option if Entity A pays quarterly dividends at the annual rate of 2.5 percent is as follows. - ![ ](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc-img/GUID-8309CD87-6718-4632-9EE1-154FCB091934-low.gif) 0.15 of a share of nonvested stock ($30 × 0.15 × 0.9754) $4.39 "Share option on 0.85 of a share of stock, $30 exercise price, 2.5% dividend yield ($3.60 × 0.85)" 3.06 Total grant date value $7.45 ##### [718-50-55-21](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-21) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:66e7837b0f9f4c3cd81e3f6a3aa0d172fee504fa97fca6856c2a0c58cb983d91 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. The first component, which is worth $4.39 at the grant date, is the minimum amount of benefits to the holder regardless of the price of the stock at the exercise date. The second component, worth $3.06 at the grant date, represents the additional benefit to the holder if the share price is above $30 at the exercise date. ##### [718-50-55-22](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-22) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:aeef984f25cc729bdab916da472bea3fef9802b52e75392553531629ef58ad1d Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. On January 1, 20X0, when its stock price is $50, Entity A offers its employees the opportunity to sign up for a payroll deduction to purchase its stock at the lower of either 85 percent of the stock's current price or 85 percent of the stock price at the end of the year when the options expire. Thus, the exercise price of the options is the lesser of $42.50 ($50x 85 percent) or 85 percent of the stock price at the end of the year when the option is exercised. Two employees each agree to have $4,250 withheld from their salaries; however, Employee A is not allowed to purchase any more shares than the $4,250 would buy on the grant date (that is, 100 shares \[$4,250/$42.50\]) and Employee B is permitted to buy as many shares as the $4,250 will permit under the terms of the plan. In both cases, the 15 percent purchase price discount at the grant date is worth $750 (100 shares x $50 x 15 percent). Depending on the stock price at the end of the year, the value of the 15 percent discount for each employee is as follows. - ![ ](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc-img/GUID-7DC69413-3D18-48A2-ADB3-E408B7FC4AA6-low.gif) Stock Price at the End of the Year Number of Shares Purchased Value of the 15 Percent Discount Scenario 1: (a) Employee A (Type A plan) $60 100 " $1,750 " Employee B (Type B plan) $60 100 " $1,750 " Scenario 2: (b) Employee A (Type A plan) $50 100 $750 Employee B (Type B plan) $50 100 $750 Scenario 3: (c) Employee A (Type A plan) $30 100 $450 Employee B (Type B plan) $30 167 $750 Scenario 4: (d) Employee A (Type A plan) $10 100 $150 Employee B (Type B plan) $10 500 $750 (a) The purchase price in this scenario would be $42.50 ($50 × 0.85) because the stock price increased during the withholding period. (b) The purchase price in this scenario would be $42.50 ($50 × 0.85) because the stock price at the end of the period was the same as the stock price at the beginning of the period. (c) The purchase price in this scenario would be $25.50 ($30 × 0.85) because the stock price decreased during the withholding period. (d) The purchase price in this scenario would be $8.50 ($10 × 0.85) because the stock price decreased during the withholding period. ##### [718-50-55-23](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-23) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:17c4d79d85d9852e472d3493893efc8c811bde5945e2754b3a26e838f41ee40b Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. As illustrated above, both awards provide the same value to the employee if the stock price at the exercise date has increased (or remained unchanged) from the grant date stock price. However, the award under the Type B plan is more valuable to the employee if the stock price at the exercise date has decreased from the grant date stock price because it guarantees that the employee always will receive at least 15 percent of the stock price at the grant date, whereas the award under the Type A plan only guarantees that the employee will receive 15 percent of the ultimate (lower) stock purchase price. ##### [718-50-55-24](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-24) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:d83a27285405e7dfa2ee4a075c31bedcb3ae7a5ca89d55c190b1dc6732fd9795 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. Using the component measurement approach described in Case A as the base, the additional feature associated with a Type B plan that shall be included in the fair value calculation is 15 percent of a put option on the employer's stock (valued by use of a standard option-pricing model, using the same measurement assumptions that were used to value the 85 percent of a call option). If the plan in that Case had the provisions of a Type B plan (that is, a plan that does not fix the number of shares that may be purchased), the fair value of the award would be calculated at the grant date as follows. - ![ ](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc-img/GUID-4AA25953-C8BA-4851-8E71-6B732FF38127-low.gif) 0.15 of a share of nonvested stock ($50 x 0.15) $7.50 "One-year call on 0.85 of a share of stock, exercise price of $50 ($7.56 x 0.85)" 6.43 "One-year put on 0.15 of a share of stock, exercise price of $50 ($4.27 x 0.15) (a)" 0.64 Total grant date fair value $14.57 (a) "Other assumptions are the same as those used to value the call option; $50 stock price, an expected life of one year, expected volatility of 30 percent, risk-free interest rate of 6.8 percent, and a zero dividend yield." With the same values the fair value of the Type A employee share purchase plan award described in Case A is determined as follows: - ![ ](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc-img/GUID-3B52350F-3F00-4E64-ACBE-591F4D968B15-low.gif) 0.15 of a share of nonvested stock ($50 x 0.15) $7.50 "One-year call on 0.85 of a share of stock, exercise price of $50 ($7.56 x 0.85)" 6.43 Total grant date fair value $13.93 ##### [718-50-55-25](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-25) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:304d56ed31b14ea940867f5aee38a0236bff3c0e9f6409a4cff48859a68b65d3 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. In Cases B through E, total compensation cost would be measured at the grant date based on the number of shares that can be purchased using the estimated total withholdings and market price of the stock as of the grant date, and not based on the potentially greater number of shares that may ultimately be purchased if the market price declines. In other words, assume that on January 1, 20X0, Employee A elects to have $850 withheld from his pay for the year to purchase stock. Total compensation cost for the Type B plan award to Employee A would be $291 ($14.57x 20 grant-date-based shares \[$850/$42.50\]). For purposes of determining the number of shares on which to measure compensation cost, the stock price as of the grant date less the discount, or $50 x 85 percent in this case, is used. ##### [718-50-55-26](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-26) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:dc017121c82cb4d8624faf2258e955deb5186356617e9b86d18fa12fc2f4a542 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. In substance, an employee share purchase plan with multiple purchase periods (a Type C plan) is a series of linked awards, similar in nature to how some view a graded vesting stock option plan. Accordingly, the fair value of an award under an employee share purchase plan with multiple purchase periods shall be determined at the grant date in the same manner as an award under a graded vesting stock option plan. Under the graded vesting approach, awards under a two-year plan with purchase periods at the end of each year would be valued as having two separate option tranches both starting on the initial grant date (using the Case A approach if the plan has the characteristics of a Type A plan or using the Case B approach if the plan has the characteristics of a Type B plan) but with different lives of 12 and 24 months, respectively. All other measurement assumptions would need to be consistent with the separate lives of each tranche. ##### [718-50-55-27](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-27) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:e3239dca86be8d9d1f3c57bbec568a5ea5f880569db461b436f6128c70c5ffe6 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. For example, if the plan in Case A was a two-year Type C plan with purchase periods at the end of each year, the fair value of each tranche of the award would be calculated at the grant date as follows. - ![ ](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc-img/GUID-7104E3FF-695D-4822-BEE6-2BC14676C752-low.gif) Tranche No. 1: 0.15 of a share of nonvested stock ($50 × 0.15) $7.50 "One-year call on 0.85 of a share of stock, exercise price of $50 ($7.56 × 0.85) (a)" 6.43 Total grant date fair value of the first tranche $13.93 Tranche No. 2: 0.15 of a share of nonvested stock ($50 × 0.15) $7.50 "Two-year call on 0.85 of a share of stock, exercise price of $50 ($11.44 × 0.85) (a)" 9.72 Total grant date fair value of the second tranche $17.22 (a) "The other assumptions are $50 stock price, an expected life of 1 year, expected volatility of 30 percent, risk-free interest rate of 6.8 percent, and a zero dividend yield (same assumptions as in footnote \[a\] of the table in paragraph 718-50-55-24). To simplify the illustration, the fair value of each of the tranches is based on the same assumptions about volatility, the risk-free interest rate, and expected dividend yield. In practice, each of those assumptions would be related to the expected life of the respective tranche, which means that at least the risk-free interest rate, and perhaps all three assumptions, would differ for each tranche." ##### [718-50-55-28](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-28) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:9fa9bab6379ef7b6e3735210dfb5bbd3329a1434e6469a9bb28f492dc3b4fe8c Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. The basic measurement approach described in Case C for a Type C plan also should be used to value awards under employee share purchase plans with multiple purchase periods that incorporate reset or rollover mechanisms (that is, Type D and Type E plans). The fair value of those awards initially can be determined at the grant date using the graded vesting measurement approach. However, at the date that the reset or rollover mechanism becomes effective, the terms of the award have been modified (the exercise price has been decreased and, for a grant under a Type E plan, the term of the award has been extended), which, in substance, is similar to an exchange of the original award for a new award with different terms. Share-based payment [modification](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/m/#modification "A change in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award.") accounting (see paragraphs [718-20-35-3 through 35-9](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/20/#718-20-35-3) ) shall be applied at the date that the reset or rollover mechanism becomes effective to determine the amount of any incremental fair value associated with the modified grant. ##### [718-50-55-29](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-29) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:c3b2a8f2c2d5900ee787107e42d5b4a2f701758e32a3e31b9671c578e93c3e1c Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. Likewise, although not a change to the terms of the employee share purchase plan, an election by an employee to increase withholding amounts (or percentages) for future services (Type F through Type H plans) is a modification of the terms of the award to that employee, which, in substance, is similar to an exchange of the original award for a new award with different terms. Accordingly, the fair value of an award under an employee share purchase plan with variable withholdings shall be determined at the grant date (using the Type A, Type B, or Type C measurement approach, as applicable) based on the estimated amounts (or percentages) that a participating employee initially elects to withhold under the terms of the plan. After the grant date (except as noted in paragraph [718-50-35-1](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-35-1)), any increases in withholding amounts (or percentages) for future services shall be accounted for as a plan modification in accordance with the guidance in paragraph [718-20-35-3](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/20/#718-20-35-3). ##### [718-50-55-30](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-30) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:d2848c678d6b6ff7bec9cdd0b36393e40d9de7b07663e0eeeda2f760dc3ea9bc Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. To illustrate, if the plan described in Case C allowed an employee to elect to change withholdings at the end of the first year, modification accounting would be applied at the date the employee elected to increase withholdings to determine the amount, if any, of incremental compensation cost. Assume that on January 1, 20X0, Employee A initially elected to have $850 per year withheld from his pay for each purchase period. However, at the end of Year 1 when the stock price is $60 (and assume that no other factors have changed), Employee A elects to have a total of $1,275 withheld for the second purchase period. At that date, $1,275 is equivalent to 30 shares eligible for purchase at the end of the second year ($1,275/$42.50). At the date Employee A elects to increase withholdings, modification accounting shall be applied to determine the amount of any incremental fair value associated with the modified award as follows. - ![ ](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc-img/GUID-13B6ABFC-4F7F-454E-AC73-45D649D414B2-low.gif) Fair value of the old option (Tranche No. 2) before modification: 0.15 of a share of nonvested stock ($60 × 0.15) $9.00 "One-year call on 0.85 of a share of stock, exercise price of $50 ($15.10 × 0.85)" 12.84 Total fair value of each option $21.84 Number of grant date shares ($850 ÷ $42.50) × 20 Total fair value $437 Fair value of the new option after modification: 0.15 of a share of nonvested stock ($60 × 0.15) $9.00 "One-year call on 0.85 of a share of stock, exercise price of $50 ($15.10 × 0.85)" 12.84 Total fair value of each option $21.84 "Number of modification date shares ($1,275 ÷ $42.50)" × 30 Total fair value $655 Incremental compensation $218 ##### [718-50-55-31](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-31) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:cd4d3f43a777ceda8efb69309f7f676cd09080c9ee1c0bafdd71f1bf87c16718 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. The incremental value is determined based on the fair value measurements at the date of the modification using the then-current stock price. To simplify the illustration, the fair value at the modification date is based on the same assumptions about [volatility](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/glossary/v/#volatility "A measure of the amount by which a financial variable such as a share price has fluctuated (historical volatility) or is expected to fluctuate (expected volatility) during a period. Volatility also may be defined as a probability-weighted measure of the dispersion of returns about the mean. The volatility of a share price is the standard deviation of the continuously compounded rates of return on the share over a specified period. That is the same as the standard deviation of the differences in the natural logarithms of the stock prices plus dividends, if any, over the period. The higher the volatility, the more the returns on the shares can be expected to vary—up or down. Volatility is typically expressed in annualized terms."), the risk-free interest rate, and expected dividend yield as at the grant date. ##### [718-50-55-32](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-32) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:4eefeb4f86141c5cfd9478345e6b152da9e77ebdd520f9026047d6021b1eba4a Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. As with all employee share purchase plans, the objective of the measurement process for employee share purchase plans with a look-back option is to reasonably measure the fair value of the award at the grant date. Unlike Type F through Type H plans, which permit an employee to increase withholding amounts (or percentages) only prospectively, the Type I plan permits an employee to make a retroactive election to increase withholdings. Under a Type I plan, an employee may elect not to participate (or to participate at a minimal level) in the plan until just before the exercise date, thus making it difficult to determine when there truly is a mutual understanding of the terms of the award, and thus the date at which the grant occurs. For example, assume that the Type A employee share purchase plan in Case A permits an employee to remit catch-up amounts (up to a maximum aggregate withholding of 15 percent of annual salary) to Entity A at any time during the term of the plan. On January 1, 20X0, Employee A elects to participate in the plan by having $100 (0.04 percent) of her $250,000 salary withheld monthly from her pay over the year. On December 20, 20X0, when the stock price is $65, Employee A elects to remit a check to Entity A for $36,300, which, together with the $1,200 withheld during the year, represents 15 percent of her salary. ##### [718-50-55-33](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-33) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:5bbbf2fe4555ff06b6ef50ce001d6d7cb6efa90e0d910b6c7cf6ebae79f13098 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. In that situation, December 20, 20X0 is the date at which Entity A and Employee A have a mutual understanding of the terms of the award in exchange for the services already rendered and Entity A becomes contingently obligated to issue equity instruments to Employee A upon the fulfillment of vesting requirements. The fair value of the entire award to Employee A is therefore measured as of December 20, 20X0. ##### [718-50-55-34](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-34) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:02acd4b8505b4d50500bb5e7281c05ff37d72611a426f866eeb31ffb10bf2ac8 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. Paragraph [718-50-25-1](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-25-1) stipulates the criteria that an employee share purchase plan must satisfy to be considered noncompensatory. One of those criteria specifies that substantially all employees that meet limited employment qualifications may participate on an equitable basis. Examples of limited employment qualifications might include customary employment of greater than 20 hours per week or completion of at least 6 months of service. ##### [718-50-55-35](https://asc.understandingaccounting.org/asc/718/50/#718-50-55-35) Pending content: no Source downloaded (UTC): 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z to 2026-09-10T01:06:19.714Z Record version: sha256:24870c449d3790bfa6b32e55c5dff4cc112c537de449a29db987958c463010e6 Snapshot version: sha256:15aea8165dff9f5ae47d9484f8470588b13b307f56e1d50801bf4d85ec190e3f Effective as of: not established by retrieval timestamps. Another criterion is that the terms are no more favorable than those available to all holders of the same class of shares. For example, Entity A offers all full-time employees and all nonemployee shareholders the right to purchase $10,000 of its common stock at a 5 percent discount from its market price at the date of purchase, which occurs in 1 month. The arrangement is not compensatory because its terms are no more favorable than those available to all holders of the same class of shares. In contrast, assume Entity B has a dividend reinvestment program that permits shareholders of its common stock the ability to reinvest dividends by purchasing shares of its common stock at a 10 percent discount from its market price on the date that dividends are distributed and Entity B offers all full-time employees the right to purchase annually up to $10,000 of its common stock at a 10 percent discount from its market price on the date of purchase. Entity B's common stock is widely held; hence, many shareholders will not receive dividends totaling at least $10,000 during the annual period. Assuming that the 10 percent discount cannot be justified as the per-share amount of share issuance costs that would have been incurred to raise a significant amount of capital by a public offering, the arrangement is compensatory because the number of shares available to shareholders at a discount is based on the quantity of shares held and the amounts of dividends declared. Whereas, the number of shares available to employees at a discount is not dependent on shares held or declared dividends; therefore, the terms of the employee share purchase plan are more favorable than the terms available to all holders of the same class of shares. Consequently, the entire 10 percent discount to employees is compensatory. If, on the other hand, the 10 percent discount can be justified as the per-share amount of share issuance costs that would have been incurred to raise a significant amount of capital by a public offering, then the entire 10 percent discount to employees is not compensatory. If an entity justifies a purchase discount in excess of 5 percent, it would be required to reassess that discount at least annually and no later than the first share purchase offer during the fiscal year. If upon reassessment that discount is not deemed justifiable, subsequent grants using that discount would be compensatory.