ASC 830-30
Translation of Financial Statements
830 Foreign Currency Matters
Source downloaded: .Record version a437d9bd4dd2. Effective date must be checked in the source.
ASC 830-30 governs how a reporting entity translates the financial statements of a foreign entity whose functional currency is not the reporting currency, when those statements are consolidated, combined, or accounted for under the equity method. Assets and liabilities are translated at the balance sheet date rate and revenues, expenses, gains, and losses at the rates on the dates recognized; the resulting translation adjustments go to other comprehensive income (accumulated as the cumulative translation adjustment, or CTA) rather than net income. The CTA is released into earnings only upon sale or complete or substantially complete liquidation of the investment in the foreign entity.
Key points (7)
- All elements are translated at current rates: assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date rate, and revenues, expenses, gains, and losses (including allocations such as depreciation, cost of sales, and amortization) at the rates on the dates they are recognized, not the rates when the related items originated (830-30-45-3; 830-30-45-4).
- Translation adjustments are excluded from net income and reported in other comprehensive income; accumulated translation adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests are allocated to the noncontrolling interest (830-30-45-12; 830-30-45-17).
- Upon sale or complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity, the related CTA is removed from equity and reported as part of the gain or loss on the sale or liquidation (830-30-40-1); a 'sale' includes loss of a controlling financial interest and a step acquisition in which the acquirer obtains control of a foreign equity method investee (830-30-40-1A).
- Sale of part of an equity method investment in a foreign entity releases a pro rata portion of the CTA into the gain or loss, but partial liquidations of net assets within a foreign entity release no CTA until the 830-30-40-1 criteria are met (830-30-40-2; 830-30-40-3).
- The rate applicable to dividend remittances is normally used; if exchangeability is temporarily lacking, the first subsequent rate at which exchanges can be made is used, and if the lack is other than temporary the propriety of consolidation, combination, or equity method accounting must be reconsidered (830-30-45-6; 830-30-45-9; Example 1 at 830-30-55-1).
- CTA is included in the carrying amount of the investment for impairment testing only when the entity has committed to a plan that will cause the CTA to be reclassified to earnings; the effective net investment hedge portion of CTA is also included (830-30-45-13; 830-30-45-15).
- Intra-entity profit eliminations use exchange rates at the dates of the sales or transfers (reasonable approximations or averages permitted), financial statements are not adjusted for rate changes occurring after the balance sheet date, and an analysis of changes in accumulated translation adjustments (beginning/ending balances, period adjustment, allocated income taxes, and amounts transferred to net income) must be presented in a separate statement, the notes, or the statement of changes in equity (830-30-45-10; 830-30-45-16; 830-30-45-18 through 45-20; 830-30-50-1).
For students. Exam questions hinge on two distinctions: remeasurement gains/losses (830-20, to net income) versus translation adjustments (830-30, to OCI), and what counts as a triggering event for releasing CTA. The most common error is assuming any cash distribution or partial liquidation of a foreign entity's net assets recycles CTA — it does not; only a sale or complete/substantially complete liquidation (or a partial sale of an equity method interest, pro rata) does.
Machine-generated study aid for ASC 830-30. Check the source paragraphs below.
830-30-00Status
Source downloaded: .Record version 7947f54ba790. Effective date must be checked in the source.
| Paragraph | Action | Accounting Standards Update | Date |
| Conduit Debt Security | Added | Maintenance Update 2014-20 (PDF) | 09/29/2014 |
| Nonpublic Entity (Def. 1) | Amended | Maintenance Update 2014-20 (PDF) | 09/29/2014 |
| Amended | Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-05 | 03/04/2013 | |
| 830-30-40-1A | Added | Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-05 | 03/04/2013 |
| 830-30-40-4 | Amended | Maintenance Update 2017-19 (PDF) | 11/15/2017 |
| 830-30-45-1 | Amended | Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01 | 01/09/2015 |
| 830-30-45-20 | Amended | Maintenance Update 2018-12 (PDF) | 09/10/2018 |
| 830-30-45-21 | Amended | Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01 | 01/09/2015 |
| 830-30-45-22 | Superseded | Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01 | 01/09/2015 |
| 830-30-65-1 | Added | Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-05 | 03/04/2013 |
830-30-05Overview and Background
Source downloaded: .Record version 7b0fc49fcd55. Effective date must be checked in the source.
830-30-15Scope and Scope Exceptions
Source downloaded: .Record version e8507e1cfeb3. Effective date must be checked in the source.
Overall Guidance
830-30-40Derecognition
Source downloaded: .Record version f345f6a0906c. Effective date must be checked in the source.
Sale or Liquidation of an Investment in a Foreign Entity
- a Removed from the separate component of equity
- b Reported as part of the gain or loss on sale or liquidation of the investment for the period during which the sale or liquidation occurs.
- a The loss of a controlling financial interest in an investment in a foreign entity resulting from circumstances contemplated by Subtopic 810-10 (see paragraph 810-10-55-4A for related implementation guidance)
- b An acquirer obtaining control of an acquiree in which it held an equity interest, accounted for as an equity method investment that is a foreign entity, immediately before the acquisition date in a business combination achieved in stages (see paragraphs ).
830-30-45Other Presentation Matters
Source downloaded: .Record version 13b17025a008. Effective date must be checked in the source.
- aTranslation of foreign currency statements
- bAnalysis of changes in cumulative translation adjustment
- cReporting other comprehensive income—income tax consequences of rate changes
- d
Translation of Foreign Currency Statements
- aTranslation using current exchange rate
- bElimination of intra-entity profits
- cTranslation after a business combination
- dReporting translation adjustments
- eSubsequent change in exchange rate
- fCumulative translation adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests.
- a For assets and liabilities, the exchange rate at the balance sheet date shall be used.
- b For revenues, expenses, gains, and losses, the exchange rate at the dates on which those elements are recognized shall be used.
- aWhether the cumulative translation adjustment shall be included in the carrying amount of the investment when assessing impairment for an investment in a foreign entity when the reporting entity does not plan to dispose of the investment (that is, the investment or related consolidated assets are held for use)
- bPlanned transactions involving foreign investments that, when consummated, will not cause a reclassification of some amount of the cumulative translation adjustment.
Analysis of Changes in Cumulative Translation Adjustment
- a In a separate financial statement
- b In notes to financial statements
- c As part of a statement of changes in equity.
- a Beginning and ending amount of cumulative translation adjustments
- b The aggregate adjustment for the period resulting from translation adjustments (see paragraph 830-30-45-12) and gains and losses from certain hedges and intra-entity balances (see paragraph 830-20-35-3).
- c The amount of income taxes for the period allocated to translation adjustments (see paragraph 830-30-45-21)
- d The amounts transferred from cumulative translation adjustments and included in determining net income for the period as a result of the sale or complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity (see paragraph 830-30-40-1).
Reporting Other Comprehensive Income—Income Tax Consequences of Rate Changes
830-30-50Disclosure
Source downloaded: .Record version 7828a98b4dae. Effective date must be checked in the source.
Analysis of Changes in Cumulative Translation Adjustment
Subsequent Rate Changes
830-30-55Implementation Guidance and Illustrations
Source downloaded: .Record version 5790e6025985. Effective date must be checked in the source.
Illustrations
- aOn December 29, 1988, the currency market was open and foreign currencies were traded. The exchange rate was FC 1.68 = USD 1.00.
- bOn December 30, 1988, Israeli banks were officially open but foreign exchange trading was suspended until January 2, 1989. A devaluation to occur on January 2, 1989, was announced. Most businesses were closed for the holidays.
- cOn December 31, 1988, banks were closed.
- dOn January 1, 1989, banks were closed.
- eOn January 2, 1989, foreign exchange transactions were executed but left unsettled until the following day when a new rate was to be established.
- fOn January 3, 1989, a new exchange rate of FC 1.81 = USD 1.00 was established and was effective for transactions left unsettled the previous day.
830-30-60Relationships
Source downloaded: .Record version c63bfb0eb0e3. Effective date must be checked in the source.
Comprehensive Income
Income Taxes
830-30-65Transition and Open Effective Date Information
Source downloaded: .Record version 9d91a548049c. Effective date must be checked in the source.
830-30-S00StatusSEC
Source downloaded: .Record version ed1b26292166. Effective date must be checked in the source.
| Paragraph | Action | Accounting Standards Update | Date |
| 830-30-S99-1 | Added | Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-19 | 05/11/2010 |
830-30-S99SEC MaterialsSEC
Source downloaded: .Record version 38483f3b51fc. Effective date must be checked in the source.
SEC Staff Guidance
- The SEC staff has received a number of inquiries regarding certain foreign currency issues related to investments in Venezuela. This announcement is in response to those inquiries that have been received by the SEC staff on the issues described below.
- Amongst other requirements, current restrictions of foreign currency exchange in Venezuela provide that entities use the official rate of exchange (official rate) to exchange funds. The official rate is set by the Venezuelan government and in order to use the official rate to exchange currency, entities seek the ability to utilize the official rate from Venezuela's Commission for Administration of Foreign Currencies (CADIVI).
- As an alternative to the use of the official rate it may also be legal to utilize the parallel rate. It is possible that the parallel rate provides entities with a more liquid exchange and entities can access the parallel rate using a series of transactions via a broker. The parallel rate has recently been significantly different from the official rate.
- Reported Balances in an Entity's Financial Statements That Differ from Their Underlying U.S. Dollar Denominated Values
- With respect to accounting for a subsidiary in Venezuela in cases where the parent's reporting currency is the U.S. dollar and the Venezuelan subsidiary's functional currency is the Venezuelan Bolivar (“Bolivar” or “BsF”), the staff has recently become aware of the following fact pattern: In years prior to 2010, certain entities may have used the parallel rate to remeasure certain U.S. dollar denominated balances that the Venezuelan subsidiary held and then subsequently translated the Venezuelan subsidiary's assets, liabilities, and operations using the official rate. The effect of this accounting treatment resulted in reported balances in an entity's financial statements that differed from their underlying U.S. dollar denominated values. (The staff notes that these differences arise when different rates are used for remeasurement and translation.) In order to illustrate the impact that these differences may have on different accounts within the financial statements, two illustrations are provided below.
- First, assume that at a period end prior to January 1, 2010 (for a calendar year entity), a U.S. entity's Venezuelan subsidiary held $10 million of cash denominated in U.S. dollars. Further assume that at the period end, the parallel rate was 5 Bolivars to every 1 U.S. dollar and the official rate was 2 Bolivars to every 1 U.S. dollar. Upon the remeasurement of the U.S. denominated cash to Bolivars and the subsequent translation of the Venezuelan subsidiary's financial statements, an entity would have reported cash of $25 million for financial reporting purposes. (The $25 million is calculated as follows: First, the $10 million of cash is remeasured using the parallel rate to 50 million BsF; subsequently, the 50 million BsF is translated back to U.S. dollars using the official rate of 2 Bolivars to 1 U.S dollars, resulting in a translated reported balance of $25 million.)
- Second, assume that at a period end prior to January 1, 2010 (for a calendar year entity), a U.S. entity's Venezuelan subsidiary held $15 million of accounts payable denominated in U.S. dollars (also assume the exchange rates are the same as in the example above). Upon the remeasurement of the U.S. denominated accounts payables to Bolivars and the subsequent translation of the Venezuelan subsidiary's financial statements, an entity would have reported accounts payable of $37.5 million for financial reporting purposes. (The $37.5 million is calculated as follows: First, the $15 million of accounts payable is remeasured using the parallel rate to 75 million BsF; subsequently, the 75 million BsF is translated back to U.S. dollars using the official rate of 2 Bolivars to 1 U.S. dollars, resulting in a translated reported balance of $37.5 million.)
- Finally, the staff has noted that Venezuela has met the thresholds for being considered highly inflationary and accordingly, calendar year entities that have not previously accounted for their Venezuelan investment as highly inflationary will begin applying highly inflationary accounting beginning January 1, 2010.
- Disclosures
- The staff believes that in cases where reported balances for financial reporting purposes differ from the actual U.S. dollar denominated balances (such as in the illustrations above), a registrant should make disclosures that inform users of the financial statements as to the nature of these differences. When material, the disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements should, at a minimum, consist of the following (The staff is aware that certain registrants have already filed their 2009 Form 10-K's and accordingly the staff would not necessarily expect these specific disclosures to be included in these registrant's 2009 Form 10-K's.):
- • Disclosure of the rates used for remeasurement and translation.
- • A description of why the actual U.S. dollar denominated balances differ from the amounts reported for financial reporting purposes, including the reasons for using two different rates with respect to remeasurement and translation.
- • Disclosure of the relevant line items (e.g. cash, accounts payable) on the financial statements for which the amounts reported for financial reporting purposes differ from the underlying U.S. dollar denominated values.
- • For each relevant line item, the difference between the amounts reported for financial reporting purposes versus the underlying U.S. dollar denominated values.
- • Disclosure of the amount that will be recognized through the income statement (as well as the impact on the other financial statements) as part of highly inflationary accounting beginning in 2010 (see below).
- Impact of Highly Inflationary Accounting on Differences between Amounts Recorded for Financial Reporting Purposes versus the Underlying U.S. Dollar Denominated Values
- The staff notes that upon application of highly inflationary accounting (January 1, 2010 for calendar year registrants), registrants must follow the accounting outlined in paragraph 830-10-45-11, which states that “the financial statements of a foreign entity in a highly inflationary economy shall be remeasured as if the functional currency were the reporting currency.”
- Accordingly, upon the application of highly inflationary accounting requirements, a U.S. reporting currency parent and subsidiary effectively utilize the same currency (U.S. dollars) and accordingly there should no longer be any differences between the amounts reported for financial reporting purposes and the amount of any underlying U.S. dollar denominated values that are held by the subsidiary. Therefore, the staff believes that any differences that may have existed prior to applying highly inflationary accounting requirements between the reported balances for financial reporting and the U.S. dollar denominated balances should be recognized in the income statement, unless the registrant can document that the difference was previously recognized as a cumulative translation adjustment (in which case the difference should be recognized as an adjustment to the cumulative translation adjustment).
- Furthermore, the staff believes that these differences should be recognized at the time of adoption of highly inflationary accounting.
- Other
- The SEC staff is aware that the EITF will be discussing certain issues related to foreign currency, including the accounting for multiple exchange rates in Venezuela, and accordingly the guidance in this staff announcement is intended to be interim guidance pending the EITF completing its deliberations.
Related subtopics
- 830-10 OverallForeign Currency Matters
- 830-20 Foreign Currency TransactionsForeign Currency Matters
- 740-830 Foreign Currency MattersIncome Taxes
- 830-946 Financial Services—Investment CompaniesForeign Currency Matters
- 230-830 Foreign Currency MattersStatement of Cash Flows
- 942-10 OverallFinancial Services—Depository and Lending